Intervista a Benedetto Della Vedova di Desirèe Ragazzi
Da Il Secolo d’Italia del 13-12-06 pag.5
«Un'apertura seria e intelligente da parte di un leader che guarda all'esperienza francese di Sarkozy con grande attenzione. La destra parigina sui temi delle unioni civili ha assunto posizioni articolate, non ideologiche e non di chiusura rispetto a realtà sociali che riguardano tutto l'elettorato e non solo una parte di esso». Benedetto Della Vedova, presidente dei Riformatori liberali e deputato di Forza Italia, si mostra soddisfatto per la disponibilità shown by Gianfranco Fini on the issue of de facto couples.
The Alliance leader raises the stakes: one can not equate de facto unions to marriage. And is against gay marriages, adoptions and drifts Zapateria ...
The first step was taken and is the most important. In a sensitive subject like this, the willingness to debate is the decisive step. Fini had the courage to open a gate in a field, often within the party, sometimes some misunderstanding arose, and some misunderstanding. Personally I am willing to discuss any assumptions. But I must consider that the de facto heterosexual couples have no priorities, no sticker precedence.
Why?
'because they do not marry is an individual choice. They could well enter into a civil marriage and this take on the commitments and access to all the prerogatives granted by law. Otherwise, however, is that of same-sex couples. They have no legal instrument that protects the public their union. I do not speak clearly to their marriage because it is a figure defined anthropologically.
Then she asks the equal unions between gay marriage?
Absolutely not ...
In recent days, said he was opposed to what he called a "parallel family law." What does this mean?
L'idea dei Pacs estesa alle coppie eterosessuali finirebbe con il generare matrimoni prima di serie "b", poi di serie "c», poi di serie "d”. Non si finirebbe mai. Le coppie di fatto, salvo il caso di chi è in attesa di divorzio, vivono questa condizione come una libera scelta. Il riconoscimento dei Pacs, quindi, delineerebbe una sorta di "diritto di famiglia parapetto" assai più eversivo dal punto di vista costituzionale del semplice riconoscimento civile delle coppie omosessuali. L'idea che il regime fiscale dei coniugi vada esteso a coloro che, potendolo, non vogliono diventare coniugi ha letteralmente dell'incredibile. Non solo per gli effetti che questo avrebbe sul piano finanziario, ma innanzitutto perché questa "beneficenza State "entirely disregarded free and responsible choice of" benefit ".
Why does the position of gay couples is different?
They need to guarantee the specific" contract "of their relationship and they are completely devoid of institutions for the protection . On this I believe that civil order should be updated, acknowledging a social reality that must not be discriminated against and at the same time, it can be defined as net diagram of the "traditional family." Only in this case is urgent to intervene, secularly choosing not to extend to them the benefits and performance, but to recognize their rights that are currently unjustly deprived.
Fini's position could create problems in the design centrist UDC? If
Casini had a reaction to harden the positions within the UDC would be contradictory to the announced transaction. The reference to Aznar and the EPP, where these issues are more moderate, the UDC should push to the open position ...
The center will be able to present a shared project?
It 's a serious error to arrive at a plan of government initiative. A sensitive issue like this needs to be addressed in Parliament. And it is a physiological fact that on both sides there are opposing positions.
The CDL is proving to not hold back ... The
CDL must be assumed that the tax policy or foreign demand should reach the broadest possible consensus. But ethical issues about the conditions are different.
can not act as a united front conservative, if only because (the people of Saint John, united in the battle anti-statism on the economy, have different positions on these issues and articulate, free, libertarian, Catholic. And then think a closed position and conservative would be a grave mistake. On issues like civil unions must represent all the views of our electorate. We must not run the risk of voter caging our decisions on ethically sensitive
0 comments:
Post a Comment